On -ite, -ian and -ist!

Recently, I linked to a piece by John Hawks where he argued that it is OK to be a Darwinist; what Hawks did not discuss are the differences between a Darwinist, a Darwinite and a Darwinian. In his latest piece, Ram Guha deals with the issue and concludes:

And so I (provisionally) conclude that, in order of loyalty or devotion to a person or doctrine, “-ist” comes before “-ite”, and “-ite” itself before “-ian”.

A nice piece — after a long time — from Guha.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: