Scientific methodology obsoleteness: the last update?

Tom Slee at Whimsley bemoans bad ideas winning the day:

Then I see that Anita Elberse of Harvard Business School has actually looked at some data behind the same Chris Anderson’s Long Tail hypothesis (please, don’t call it a theory) and, not surprisingly found it misguided. You would think that would cheer me up, but reading Anderson’s response just (here and reprinted here) plunged me further into gloom. Why? Because although he loses this battle (if asked I will bore people with the details, but I really don’t think there is a point), sloppy business journalism has won the war.

Face it. Chris Anderson has people at Harvard Business School of all places spending their valuable time following up his idle speculations. He comes up with a half-baked idea, has basically no data to support it, and yet other people – smart people, with real jobs and things to do – actually spend their time following up these idle daydreams; acting as his research assistants. What a waste.

And other people – smart people, probably with families and friends who could use their attention – feel they have to spend their time explaining a few of the reasons why he is wrong in his latest article. And here I am wasting my evening writing this junk.

Journalists and popular science or technology writers should take the serious thoughts of others and communicate them in an interesting and attention-getting way. I have no problem with that. But this is all backwards: a few stories from a business journalist setting the research agenda of Harvard Business School?

How did this happen?

I guess this post is also a reminder to me that I should stop updating on the issue!

Advertisements

Tags:

One Response to “Scientific methodology obsoleteness: the last update?”

  1. gaddeswarup Says:

    If you feel that some thing is right and feel strongly about it, I think that you should persist until proven wrong. Andrew Gelman has a post too with links to another in http://www.stat.columbia.edu/~gelman/blog/

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: