Grain growth: Beyond von Neumann-Mullins

Today I heard Prof. D J Srolovitz talk on Curvature driven growth in polycrystalline materials and froths: beyond von NeumannMullins.

In 2D,

  • using Euler’s polyhedron formula,
  • assuming that triple junctions are points at which the grain boundaries make 120 degrees with each other (in other words, achieve equilibrium), and,
  • in systems with isotropic interfacial energy,

von Neumann showed that if the curvature of any given domain wall is a constant (as it is in soap froths), then six sided grains are stable; the grains with sides less than 6 will shrink while ones with sides greater than 6 will grow. The contribution of Mullins is to show that this result holds even if the curvature is not a constant (mean curvature is what matters) on any given domain wall (as in the case of grain boundaries). This result can also be derived using Gauss-Bonnet theorem. This is a purely topological result.

Apparently, there had been many attempts to generalise von Neumann-Mullins to 3D; however, none of these attempts have been successful in obtaining an exact result. Prof. Srolovitz and R D MacPherson have not only managed to generalise the results to 3D, but to any higher dimension. Unfortunately, I am not able to get any reference to their work on the net. So, here is my attempt at summarising the idea:

  1. Generalise 2D von Neumann-Mullins to multiply connected domains;
  2. Volume integrate the result; this is equivalent to considering all possible sections of a 3D structure, and doing a von Neumann-Mullins analysis on each, and putting the results together.

Apparently doing all this introduces a natural measure of length called mean width (which is a Hadwiger measure); and, using such a measure, von Neumann-Mullins can be generalised to N-dimensional domain wall networks and the 2D and 3D networks are just the special cases of such a general result. And, as it turns out, in 3D (and in higher dimensions), curvature driven growth is not purely topological.

Finally, ‘curvature’ in this post means mean curvature (and not Gaussian); by the way, while you are at it, take a look at this wiki page on curvature; and, this history of curvature page which it links to. Have fun!


3 Responses to “Grain growth: Beyond von Neumann-Mullins”

  1. Grain Growth: Beyond von Neumann--Mullins --Edition 2 « Entertaining Research Says:

    […] Growth: Beyond von Neumann–Mullins –Edition 2 Nearly six months ago, I heard Prof. Srolovitz on the topic, and blogged about the talk here; as I noted in that post, unfortunately, I did not have any resources to link to then; instead, I […]

  2. Bubbles and growth « Entertaining Research Says:

    […] and growth No; this is not about soap bubbles or grain growth. This is about economic bubbles and why they are great for economic […]

  3. Shapes of crystallites and their evolution « Entertaining Research Says:

    […] this blog might already have noticed, this post is based on a couple that I wrote on this problem: here and […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: