Archive for January, 2009

May be I should feel ashamed

January 23, 2009

For publishing this list — since it might indicate my arrogance of power — not to mention the debasement of those who read it; but since I don’t, here you go:

  1. A telescope
  2. A bamboo microscope
  3. A thermometer
  4. A compass
  5. A kaleidoscope
  6. A periscope
  7. A stethoscope
  8. A bug viewer
  9. Two lenses — Big and small
  10. A fabric tester
  11. A solar filter, and,
  12. A soma cube

are the things that I bought from Jodo Gyan (about whose microscope I have written already — I am glad yo say that I now am a proud owner of one!) for myself — apart from some pictorial puzzles, lego pieces and books that we got for Maithri.

Flaws of our brains!

January 23, 2009

A glorious sentence from John Hawks:

Our brains are all flawed in gloriously variable ways.

India: then and now, through the eyes of Ian jack

January 23, 2009

Ian Jack in an interview with Mukund Padmanabhan — in the Hindu today:

You come to India almost every year. Do you see huge changes from the time you first visited in 1976?

These observations would be in the nature of subjective impressions. First of all, I came here first for traditional Anglo-Saxon reasons. I wanted to see where my granny was born in Meerut, I wanted to see steam locomotives. I had very little knowledge of Indian society or Indian history. I mean I had read Jan Morris and Pax Britannica – but I guess I was quite interested in imperialism more than anything else.

India seemed quite remote, a previous Britain in a charming way, if you like. It was so different, yet quite familiar — the Ambassador cars, the steam engines, red post boxes, English spoken in an Anglicised rather than Americanised way, newspapers that had these things called middles and leaders…It was in an engaging kind of time warp. It was a much more socialistic-looking place — family planning slogans, exhortations from Nehru and Gandhi to do this or that. Apart from Britannia biscuits and Amul’s Utterly Butterly, it wasn’t a consumerist society, it was more austere.

Now it’s a more modern society — in its upper reaches anyway — than Britain is. One doesn’t come here any more to look for quaint things. The world is present here as quickly as, if not more quickly than, in Britain. But as far as the bigger things go — are there fewer or more poor people here — I don’t know. But certainly, money is what you notice here. But in terms of social disparity, things seem as bad as they were, if not worse.

Rest of the interview is not really great, though!

A pdftk + LaTeX tip that I learnt today!

January 22, 2009

Suppose you have several papers, say, of Eshelby, in pdf format. Suppose you want to make the collected works of Eshelby using these pdf. Here is a page that tells you how to go about doing it. It works exactly as the page says it should; however, there was a small tweak I did in the second script. Since the page numbering is used as the background, sometimes, for some pdf files, the page numbers are not visible. That can be overcome by making the pages as background and writing the page number on this background. Of course, when you have a collection of pdfs with not all of them having the same written area, a little bit of tweaking of the page height etc are needed to make sure that on all pages the title (Eshelby: Collected Works) and the page number are such that they are not overwriting any text. Have fun!

Joseph Priestly and his inventions

January 22, 2009

This piece in NPR with an excerpt from THE INVENTION OF AIR: A Story of Science, Faith, Revolution, and the Birth of America by Steven Johnson caught my eye:

Author Steven Johnson’s new book, The Invention of Air, is, on the one hand, a supple examination of the man largely credited with the discovery of oxygen. On the other, it’s a subtle reminder of the intellectual glories of bygone days when great thinkers mastered numerous fields, not merely one.

If the excerpt is any indication, it looks like a non-stop read:

The first sign of a waterspout forming is a dark stain on the surface of the sea, like a circle of black ink. Within a matter of minutes, if atmospheric conditions are right, a spiral of light and dark streaks begins to spin around the circle. Soon a ring of spray rises up into the air, water molecules propelled aloft by the accelerating winds at its periphery. And then the spout surges to life, a whirling line drawn from sea to sky, sustained by rotational winds that have been measured at up to 150 miles per hour.

Unlike land-based tornados, waterspouts often form in fair weather: a vortex of wind, capable of destroying small vessels, that appears, literally, out of the blue. While it is not nearly as dangerous as a traditional tornado, the waterspout was long a figure of fear and wonder in mariner tales of life on the open sea. In the first century B.C., Lucretius described “a kind of column [that] lets down from the sky into the sea, around which the waters boil, stirred up by the heavy blast of the winds, and if any ships are caught in that tumult, they are tossed about and come into great peril.” Sailors would pour vinegar into the sea and pound on drums to frighten off the spirits that they imagined lurking in the spout. They had good reason to be mystified by these apparitions. The upward pull of the vortex is strong enough to suck fish, frogs, or jellyfish out of the water and carry them into the clouds, sometimes depositing them miles from their original location. Scientists now believe that apocryphal-sounding stories of fish and frogs raining from the sky were actually cases where waterspouts gulped up a menagerie of creatures straight out of the water, and then deposited them on the heads of bewildered humans when the spout crossed over onto land and dissipated.

A waterspout sighting is a meteorological rarity, even in the tropical waters where spouts are most often seen. Ships in the colder waters of the North Atlantic, particularly during early spring, almost never encounter them. So it was more than a little surprising that, on one extraordinary day in the spring of 1794, the hundred-odd passengers en route to New York aboard the merchant ship Samson caught sight of four distinct waterspouts simultaneously drifting their way across the sea.

Most passengers onboard the Samson would have viewed the looming spouts not as statistical anomalies but as sinister omens, if not outright threats. No doubt some passengers aboard the Samson ran below decks in fear at the first sighting, while others stared in wonder at the four spouts. But we can say with some confidence that one passenger aboard the Samson rushed to the deck at the first hint of a waterspout sighting, and stood transfixed, observing the spray patterns and cloud formations. It is easy to imagine him borrowing the captain’s telescope and peering into the vortex, estimating wind velocity, perhaps jotting down notes as he watched. He would have known that the lively scientific debate over spouts—started in part by his old friend Benjamin Franklin—revolved around whether spouts descended from clouds, as tornados do, or whether they propelled themselves upward from the ocean surface. The idea of witnessing four waterspouts on a North Atlantic voyage would not have been a sign of foreboding or an imminent threat for him. It would have been a stroke of extraordinary good luck.

Take a look!

On the three kinds of innovations

January 22, 2009

D Balasubramanian, in his latest Speaking of Science column in The Hindu, summarises a talk delivered by Kiran Mazumdar-Shaw of Biocon at IISc during IISc’s centenary celebrations on the three kinds of innovations, namely, incremental, evolutionary and breakthrough; he also gives some examples of successful breakthrough innovations:

The third is what she terms “breakthrough innovation”. This involves the creation of a radically new product, service, process or business model. Breakthrough is about new technology and novel products that are derived from experimental innovation. The electric car “Reva” or Biocon’s own “oral insulin” exemplify this.

Apart from Biocon’s oral insulin, let me quote another example. This comes from the innovative idea of DR. R. A. Mashelkar, then at the Council of Scientific & Industrial Research (CSIR), termed the New Millennium Indian Technology Leadership Initiative or NMITLI.

In one of the projects under this scheme, CSIR brought together a few eye research centres, a CISR research laboratory (CCMB at Hyderabad) and the Bangalore-based company Xcyton, and urged them to produce a DNA-based “chip” that would detect microbial infection of the eye, and point out whether the pathogen is a bacterium, fungus, or virus. This novel diagnostic chip is now in the market. The last and the most challenging category is “experimental innovation”, which in reality is close to, or identical to, invention. The driver here is the next practice.

One of the innovations that Balasubramanian talks about, namely Reva car, is my favourite too!

On the literary outputs of failed states!

January 22, 2009

Ram Guha in a short note in the Outlook:

Pakistan may or may not be a failed state; but it is unquestionably a society in deep crisis. And like other such, it has produced great literature. The brutalities of Tsarist Russia gave us Tolstoy and Dostoevsky; the corruptions of Latin America gave us Marquez and Paz; the terror of Stalin and Stalinism gave us Kundera, Havel, and Solzhenitsyn. The generals and bigots of Pakistan have already given us Mohsin Hamid and Mohammed Hanif; now we have Daniyal Mueenuddin and Ali Sethi. There will be more to come.

Somehow, the last line sounds very ominous. As much as I appreciate the high quality literary output, I would much rather prefer a people-friendly and humane government in Pakistan!

On the perturbability (or, lack thereof) of elevator operators!

January 21, 2009

Thanks to my colleague Murali (who, I understand, learnt about the paper from Prof. Veeravalli), I came across this really nice spoof paper (which, I see, from the Google search results, was also reprinted in Current Science); I especially liked the acknowledgement:

The research reported in this paper has in part been suppressed by the Office of Navel Research under Contract AI-tum-OU812 with the Institute of Studied Advances.

Have fun!

Origins of multisensory brain mechanisms

January 21, 2009

An interesting commentary in the latest issue of PNAS (on a paper that appears in the same issue):

Seeing who we hear and hearing who we see

R M Seyfarth and D L Cheney

Imagine that you’re working in your office and you hear two voices outside in the hallway. Both are familiar. You immediately picture the individuals involved. You walk out to join them and there they are, looking exactly as you’d imagined. Effortlessly and unconsciously you have just performed two actions of great interest to cognitive scientists: cross-modal perception (in this case, by using auditory information to create a visual image) and individual recognition (the identification of a specific person according to a rich, multimodal, and individually distinct set of cues, and the placement of that individual in a society of many others). An article in this issue of PNAS by Proops, McComb, and Reby (1) shows that horses do it, too, and just as routinely, without any special training. The result, although not surprising, is nonetheless the first clear demonstration that a non-human animal recognizes members of its own species across sensory modalities. It raises intriguing questions about the origins of conceptual knowledge and the extent to which brain mechanisms in many species—birds, mammals, as well as humans—are essentially multisensory.

Have fun!

What is paleofantasy?

January 20, 2009

Even though not quite in the same league as the ideas discussed, this post, touched a cord with me since I also face so many of my close relatives and friends who believe that all the ills and diseases that we face today were either absent in an earlier “golden” Indian era or were completely treatable and curable by the local doctors and physicians of that period!

As an evolutionary biologist, I was filled with enthusiasm at first over the idea of a modern mismatch between everyday life and our evolutionary past. But a closer look reveals that not all evolutionary ideas are created equal; even for Darwinians, the devil is in the details. The notion that there was a time of perfect adaptation, from which we’ve now deviated, is a caricature of the way evolution works.

Take a look!


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.