<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thinking philosophically, in the physical sciences</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mogadalai.wordpress.com/2007/12/15/thinking-philosophically-in-the-physical-sciences/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mogadalai.wordpress.com/2007/12/15/thinking-philosophically-in-the-physical-sciences/</link>
	<description>Alicious Adventures of a Malkanthapuragudi-an! (Perseus cluster -- thanks to Chet at Science Musings blog)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 19:43:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guru</title>
		<link>http://mogadalai.wordpress.com/2007/12/15/thinking-philosophically-in-the-physical-sciences/#comment-20604</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guru]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 18:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mogadalai.wordpress.com/2007/12/15/thinking-philosophically-in-the-physical-sciences/#comment-20604</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Amelo14,

Thanks for stopping by and the comment; I have Kuhn&#039;s structure of scientific revolutions with me (because I once heard that nobody should be allowed to use the word paradigm shift unless he or she has read the book); but, I have not read it yet (which might explain the absence of the use of &quot;paradigm shift&quot; in my posts :-)

Guru

PS: Long back, I did try to read the book without much of success.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Amelo14,</p>
<p>Thanks for stopping by and the comment; I have Kuhn&#8217;s structure of scientific revolutions with me (because I once heard that nobody should be allowed to use the word paradigm shift unless he or she has read the book); but, I have not read it yet (which might explain the absence of the use of &#8220;paradigm shift&#8221; in my posts <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Guru</p>
<p>PS: Long back, I did try to read the book without much of success.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amelo14</title>
		<link>http://mogadalai.wordpress.com/2007/12/15/thinking-philosophically-in-the-physical-sciences/#comment-20589</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[amelo14]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 13:22:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mogadalai.wordpress.com/2007/12/15/thinking-philosophically-in-the-physical-sciences/#comment-20589</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Quite interesting post. Wondering if you have ever had the chance to read Thomas Kuhn&#039;s work?

Andrés]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quite interesting post. Wondering if you have ever had the chance to read Thomas Kuhn&#8217;s work?</p>
<p>Andrés</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
