I have read his Samskara in Tamil translation. It was a nice novel if a bit sad to read. My attempts to read Samsakara in Kannada were not successful. I have heard good things about Bharatipura; I have not read it yet though. Here is Hindu reporting on his passing away.
Hindu reports on the passing away; I have learnt lots about yogasanas from his books!
I have been thinking about the recent discussions about the four year Bachelor’s programme in sciences at the Indian Institute of Science.
The ministry said that the four-year programme in general streams of arts, science and commerce had violated the National Policy on Education, 1986. The ministry says the NPE provides for 10+2+3 system for students pursuing general stream of education.
I was curious about the National Policy on Education, 1986 — primarily to see what the rationale behind such a prescription is. The document is available here; as far as I can see, this is all it says:
The National System of Education envisages a common educational structure. The 10+2+3 system has now been accepted in all parts of the country.
So, in the document, there is really no justification except for common structure. The document, also notes that the Policy from 1968 wanted the 10+2+3 system to be made broadly acceptable; and, in 1986, it seems that the introduction of the 10+2+3 system was seen as the most notable development. So, I can understand how UGC might see the introduction of the 4 year Science undergraduate programme as a retrograde move.
However, there seem to be some strong arguments as to why we should at least experiment with a four year degree programme in science:
A paper prepared jointly by three Indian science academies in 2008 identified various limitations of the present system that focuses on quantity of information rather than the quality of education. The report argued for a four-year program with an emphasis on flexibility in curriculum, choice of subjects and research experience. They also recommended allowing students to switch between science and engineering.
I also agree with the following point from Guttal’s post:
India’s requirement as a large and diverse country cannot and should not rely on a failed mode of higher education uniformly imposed across the entire country. Experiments to improve education must be encouraged, especially if the premier institutes of the country are taking the lead. We can only know what works best if we attempt a variety of approaches.
Hence, I feel UGC should allow the four year programmes on an experimental basis (at least in places like IISc where both the Institution and the stakeholders, namely, faculty, students and parents seem to be in favour of the experiment).
Finally, personally, even as a matter of policy, I am not in favour of strict uniformity while I am all for broad uniformity; of course, where there are deviations from the uniformity, UGC and MHRD should spend more effort to make sure that the changes are in keeping with the spirit of things. I believe, in the long run, this is the only way to make our academic system more robust, flexible, innovative and modern.
This is the second time I am using Ubuntu automatic upgrade; yesterday, I went from Ubuntu 12.04 to 14.04. But for some glitches with tex-common and octave (which I believe I have fixed now). Very nice indeed!
Read Dian Fosey’s Gorillas in the mist. A very sad but truly elevating reading experience. Strongly recommended.
Also read Reif Larsen’s The young and prodigious T. S. Spivet. A nice novel. Enjoyed reading it a lot. Another strong recommendation!
Who can dismantle and put back a blast furnace!
I remember walking along Jubilee Park when a man in a bowtie greeted us. He was walking a hysterical-looking poodle. I laughed at the sight. My father reprimanded me, “Don’t get carried away by appearances. That man is a great engineer. He can roll up his sleeves and dismantle and put back a blast furnace.” All his examples were anecdotes or parables; one learnt by example.
That is Shiv Visvanathan remembering his metallurgist father. Take a look!
Singing without any accompaniment has a particular charm which we do not get to enjoy often. I heard Dr. Sriram Parasuram on Raagaa: a design principle yesterday and the demonstration pieces he sang were very nice. The talk was very interesting too!
All three are great. I have finished 1 and 2 and am about to complete 3. If I have to order the books by my preference, it would be 3, 1, and 2.